Cong Wang,1 Lidan Liu,1 Xue Bai2 

1Department of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Health Management, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Xue Bai, Department of Health Management, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110004, People’s Republic of China, Email xbai88@cmu.edu.cn

Purpose: The adverse effects and drug abuse issues associated with opioid drugs have made finding a safe and effective alternative a focus of research. Oliceridine has attracted attention for its lower adverse reactions, such as respiratory depression and gastrointestinal issues, compared to traditional opioids, and is considered a promising candidate for addressing the current limitations in opioid therapy. This article explored the knowledge structure of oliceridine through bibliometric analysis, highlighting its clinical applications in managing acute pain and its mechanisms that may reduce addiction risk. Our bibliometric analysis highlighted hotspots and trends in oliceridine research, guiding future studies on its safety and efficacy in pain management.
Methods: This study utilized the Web of Science Core Collection database to search for articles related to oliceridine from 2013 to 2024. Systematic analysis was conducted on publication, country, institution, author, journal, references, and keywords. The software Citespace, Vosviewer, and Bibliometrix were employed to visualize bibliometric analysis.
Results: From 2013 to 2024, 159 articles on oliceridine were published in 98 journals by 158 institutions from 28 countries. The United States has rapidly developed in this field, providing significant momentum. Keyword clustering analysis revealed that research on oliceridine primarily focused on exploring its molecular and pharmacological mechanisms and conducting clinical studies to evaluate its efficacy and safety in pain management. Analyses of the strongest citation bursts with references and keywords indicated that protein-biased ligands and oliceridine were hotspots. The emergence of divergent views regarding oliceridine’s biased agonism will lead to future hotspots focusing on the underlying mechanisms of biased signaling by G protein-coupled receptors and drug design.
Conclusion: Bibliometric analysis provides insights into the current hotspots and emerging areas of oliceridine, which can guide future research. The widespread attention and clinical application of oliceridine lay a solid foundation for further drug development and clinical trials.

Keywords: opioid receptors, biased agonism, oliceridine, bibliometrics