论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
预测绝经前女性残留和复发的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的随机生存森林模型
Authors Zhai F , Mu S, Song Y, Zhang M, Zhang C, Lv Z
Received 13 August 2024
Accepted for publication 24 October 2024
Published 30 October 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 1775—1787
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S485515
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Vinay Kumar
Furui Zhai, Shanshan Mu, Yinghui Song, Min Zhang, Cui Zhang, Ze Lv
Gynecological Clinic, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Furui Zhai, Gynecological Clinic, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou City, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-0317-2075783, Email zfr860708@126.com
Purpose: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) carries significant risks of recurrence and persistence. This study compares the efficacy of a random survival forest (RSF) model with that of a conventional Cox regression model for predicting residual and recurrent high-grade CIN in premenopausal women after LEEP.
Methods: Data from 458 premenopausal women treated for CIN2/3 at our hospital between 2016 and 2020 were analyzed. The RSF model incorporated demographic, pathological, and treatment-related variables. Feature selection utilizing LASSO and three other algorithms was performed to enhance the RSF model, which was further compared to a Cox regression model. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), out-of-bag (OOB) error rates, and SHAP values to interpret predictor importance.
Results: The RSF model showed superior performance compared to the Cox regression model, with AUC values of 0.767– 0.901 and peak predictive performance at 36 months post-LEEP. In contrast, the highest AUC achieved by Cox regression was 0.880. The RSF model also exhibited relatively lower OOB error rates, indicating better generalizability. Moreover, SHAP value analysis identified margin status and CIN severity as the most prominent predictors that directly affected risk predictions. Lastly, an online tool providing real-time predictions in clinical settings was successfully implemented using the RSF model.
Conclusion: The RSF model outperformed the traditional Cox regression model in predicting residual and recurrent high-grade CIN risks post-LEEP. This model may be a more accurate clinical tool that facilitates improved personalized care and early interventions in gynecological oncology.
Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, residual/recurrent, random survival forest, Cox regression, premenopausal women