已发表论文

贝伐珠单抗联合抗pd -1/PD-L1抑制剂联合肝动脉灌注化疗治疗初始不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性

 

Authors Tang X , Chen J , Peng W, Yang Z, Hu L, Ye Z , Fu Y , Hu D, Zhou Z, Chen M, Zhang Y , Wang JC

Received 16 July 2024

Accepted for publication 18 October 2024

Published 26 October 2024 Volume 2024:13 Pages 559—569

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S478685

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Professor Michael Shurin

Xiang Tang,1,2,* Jinbin Chen,1,2,* Wei Peng,1,2,* Zhoutian Yang,1,2 Li Hu,1,2 Zhiwei Ye,1,2 Yizhen Fu,1,2 Dandan Hu,1,2 Zhongguo Zhou,1,2 Minshan Chen,1,2 Yaojun Zhang,1,2 Jun-Cheng Wang1,2 

1State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Yaojun Zhang; Jun-Cheng Wang, Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China, Email zhangyuj@sysucc.org.cn; wangjch@sysucc.org.cn

Objection: To report the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with bevacizumab plus anti-PD-1 (BP1) or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (BPL) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a first-line treatment for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with initially uHCC received either BP1-HAIC or BPL-HAIC as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).
Results: Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 136 patients with initially uHCC received triple combination therapy, with 76 in the BP1-HAIC group and 60 in the BPL-HAIC group. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.0– 13.7 months), and the median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.3- not reached). Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in PFS (HR, 0.91, P = 0.69) or OS (HR, 0.71, P = 0.31) between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. The ORR was 46.3% per RECIST v1.1 and 66.9% per mRECIST, with a DCR of 83.1% under both criteria. Common adverse events (AEs) included hypoalbuminemia and elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, with 5.1% (7/136) experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor number and BCLC stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor number for PFS.
Conclusion: Triple combination therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and tumor response in initially uHCC. No notable differences in outcomes were observed between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. AEs were manageable in clinical practice.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitor, bevacizumab, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, adverse event