论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
提高周围型肺结核诊断的准确性:使用引导鞘支气管内超声检查的CapitalBioTM分枝杆菌核酸检测试验和结核分枝杆菌等温RNA扩增试验的比较评价
Authors Zhou L, Yong Y, Li H, Hu Q
Received 6 July 2024
Accepted for publication 10 October 2024
Published 25 October 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 4685—4693
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S476732
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Sandip Patil
Lihong Zhou,1 Yan Yong,1 Hao Li,2 Qin Hu1
1Zhejiang Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Zhejiang Chinese and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 2Tuberculosis Laboratory, Zhejiang Chinese and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Qin Hu, Zhejiang Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Zhejiang Chinese and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13968146922, Fax +86-571-56109821, Email qinhu19832023@163.com
Purpose: The diagnosis of tuberculosis located in the peripheral zone remains challenging and requires ultrasound bronchoscopy-guided maneuvers. We assessed the precision of CapitalBioTM Mycobacterium nucleic acid detection test (CapitalBio MTB test) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis isothermal RNA amplification test (MTB-RNA) using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and compared it with those of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear and MTB culture tests.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 287 patients suspected of peripheral pulmonary tuberculosis who underwent EBUS-GS examinations, medical examination results of AFB smears, MTB culture, CapitalBio MTB test, and MTB-RNA were analyzed. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and its diagnostic accuracy for peripheral PTB was evaluated in comparison with the final clinical diagnosis.
Results: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of CapitalBio MTB test were 44.83%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 54.07%, and 0.72, respectively; those of MTB-RNA were 22.99%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 45.75%, and 0.61, respectively, and those for parallel test (CapitalBio MTB test or MTB-RNA) were 46.55%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 54.85%, and 0.73, respectively. These values for AFB smear were 9.2%, 97.35%, 84.21%, 41.04%, and 0.53, respectively, and those of MTB culture were 31.03%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 48.50%, and 0.69, respectively.
Conclusion: The CapitalBio MTB test showed the best diagnostic performance compared with AFB smear, MTB culture, and MTB-RNA assays and was similar to the parallel test (CapitalBio MTB test or MTB-RNA). The CapitalBio MTB test combined with EBUS-GS had satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing peripheral PTB.
Keywords: sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve, endobronchial ultrasonography, polymerase chain reaction, nucleic acid molecular testing