论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
糖尿病视网膜病变的潜在诊断标志物:血清LncRNA MIAT、HOTTIP、SNHG16
Authors Li B, Du YJ, Xu F, Li HB, Yang X
Received 26 March 2024
Accepted for publication 1 October 2024
Published 13 November 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 4247—4256
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S470755
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Antonio Brunetti
Bo Li,1,* Yan-Jun Du,2,* Feng Xu,3 Hong-Bing Li,4 Xu Yang1
1Ophthalmology Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Suining Third People’s Hospital, Suining, People’s Republic of China; 3Ultrasonography Department, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, People’s Republic of China; 4AIER Ophthalmology, Suining, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Xu Yang, Email yangxu1_10@163.com
Purpose: To study the expression and diagnostic ability of the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) MIAT, HOTTIP, and SNHG16 in serum of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Methods: A total of 70 healthy controls and 195 patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) were collected. T2D patients include 65 patients with Nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR), 65 patients with Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and 65 patients with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The relative expression of MIAT, HOTTIP and SNHG16 in participant serum was measured through Real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction to compare the differential expression between the groups. t test, Mann‒Whitney U-test, Pearson’s chi-square test and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the expression of these LncRNAs and their diagnostic ability for DR.
Results: We compare the healthy control group with T2D group, healthy control group with NDR group, NDR group with DR (NPDR+PDR) group, and NPDR group with PDR group. When NDR group was compared with the healthy control group, there was no difference between MIAT (p> 0.05)and HOTTIP (p> 0.05), only the relative expression of SNHG16(p< 0.05) was different and it’s ROC curve had identification significance. In the remaining inter-group comparisons, the differences in the expression of MIAT (p< 0.05), HOTTIP (p< 0.05) and SNHG16 (p< 0.05) were statistically significant, and their ROC curves were all had identification significance.
Conclusion: These findings prove that serum LncRNA MIAT, HOTTIP and SNHG16 may be used as potential markers to monitor the progress of DR.
Keywords: LncRNA MIAT, HOTTIP, SNHG16, diabetic retinopathy, type 2 diabetes