论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
中国上海健康女性面部皮肤中表皮葡萄球菌的耐药谱和mupA基因特征
Authors Chen B, Yao L, Cai R, Chen W, Wang Y
Received 26 July 2024
Accepted for publication 25 November 2024
Published 9 December 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2813—2821
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S481517
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha
Bingqing Chen,1 Lingyun Yao,2 Rongjuan Cai,2 Wei Chen,3 Yue Wang2,4
1Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Institute of Shanghai Oriental Beauty Valley, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Yue Wang, Institute of Shanghai Oriental Beauty Valley, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Fengxiani District, Shanghai, 201418, People’s Republic of China, Email yue_wong@sit.edu.cn
Purpose: To explore antimicrobial resistance profiles and mupA gene characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from facial skin of healthy females in Shanghai, China.
Patients and Methods: In this study, we collected facial skin samples from 107 healthy females in Shanghai, China, and S. epidermidis isolation was performed. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of 10 antibiotics were determined for the S. epidermidis isolates using the agar dilution method. High-level mupirocin-resistant isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. A total of 94 un-duplicated S. epidermidis isolates were obtained from 107 facial skin samples.
Results: Antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that 23.4% of the 94 S. epidermidis isolates were resistant to oxacillin and positive for the mecA gene, which could be cauterized as methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). Resistance rates for erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin were 8.5%, 11.7%, 10.6%, 12.8%, and 1.1%, respectively. For mupirocin, the rates of low- and high-level resistance were 3.2% (3/94) and 11.7% (11/94), respectively. Resistance to vancomycin or linezolid was not observed. High-level mupirocin resistance in facial skin isolates is mediated by mupA. WGS and SNP-based phylogenetic analyses revealed diverse phylogenies among the 11 mupA-positive S. epidermidis isolates. Additionally, various resistance and virulence genes were identified in mupA-positive isolates. A new hybrid plasmid carrying mupA genes was found in two S. epidermidis isolates.
Conclusion: We observed a considerable level of antimicrobial resistance to several antibiotics and the prevalence of abundant and diverse resistance and virulence genes in the facial skin-origin S. epidermidis isolates. This may pose a potential risk for both public health and S. epidermidis infection.
Keywords: Staphylococcus epidermidis, skin, resistance, mupirocin