已发表论文

内镜经鼻手术治疗侵犯颈内动脉的颅底放射性骨坏死:临床特点和手术策略

 

Authors Zhao T , Xu Z, Xu M, Lai Y, Chen X, Shi Z 

Received 25 May 2024

Accepted for publication 17 October 2024

Published 19 December 2024 Volume 2024:20 Pages 871—881

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S479849

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Deyun Wang

Tianfeng Zhao,1 Zhuo Xu,2 Min Xu,2 Yubin Lai,2 Xiaodong Chen,2 Zhaohui Shi3,4 

1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Longgang Otolaryngology Hospital & Shenzhen Otolaryngology Research Institute, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Naso-Orbital-Maxilla and Skull Base Center, Department of Allergy, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Zhaohui Shi, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Naso-Orbital-Maxilla and Skull Base Center, Department of Allergy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-20-85253333, Fax +86-20-85253336, Email shizhh35@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Objective: This study aims to summarize the clinical characteristics of skull base osteoradionecrosis (ORN) with the internal carotid artery (ICA) involvement and to distill the key surgical techniques that can enhance the protective measures for ICA.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study over a six-year period from February 2017 to May 2023. We included patients who were diagnosed with osteoradionecrosis with invasion of the internal carotid artery and collected their demographic information, pathology results, complication rates, ect. The goal was the alleviated rate after the surgery and the anatomic consideration during the surgery. We compared the verbal rating score (VRS) of headache pre- and post-operation by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 patients diagnosed with ORN, with a mean age of 53.73 yr (range, 32– 68 yr). Among them, 17 patients (89.47%) were nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 1 patient (5.23%) was squamous cell carcinoma of the sphenoid sinus, and 1 patient (5.23%) had adenoid cystic carcinoma. After the surgery, 1 fatality occurred within 2 months, which was attributed to a severe parapharyngeal space infection.1 patient succumbed to ICA rupture two days post-operation. Additionally, 1 patient experienced ORN recurrence 2 years after the initial surgery. The mean follow-up period for the study was 37.47 mo (range 2 − 77 mo). The alleviation rate was 89.4%. The results revealed a significant decrease in VRS after the surgery (Z=− 3.921, P=0.000). Finally, we summarized clinical evidences of ICA involvement, such as the formation of pseudoaneurysm.
Conclusion: A four-quadrant division of SBORN as a standardized and systematic approach is meaningful to guide surgical intervention for osteoradionecrosis. There are relevant clinical and imaging evidences that can predict the rupture of ICA.

Keywords: skull base osteoradionecrosis, skull base debridement surgery, endonasal endoscopic approach