已发表论文

III级弥漫性胶质瘤放化疗治疗中预后分子表型和临床特征的开发和验证

 

Authors Gu W, Tang J, Liu P, Gan J, Lai J, Xu J, Deng J, Liu C , Wang Y, Zhang G, Yu F, Shi C, Fang K , Qiu F

Received 15 August 2024

Accepted for publication 11 November 2024

Published 6 January 2025 Volume 2025:21 Pages 35—53

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S478905

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh

Weiguo Gu,1,2,* Jiaming Tang,2,* Penghui Liu,1 Jinyu Gan,1 Jianfei Lai,1 Jinbiao Xu,2 Jianxiong Deng,2 Chaoxing Liu,1 Yuhua Wang,2 Guohua Zhang,3 Feng Yu,1,2 Chao Shi,2,3 Ke Fang,2 Feng Qiu2,3 

1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Nanchang Key Laboratory of Tumor Gene Diagnosis and Innovative Treatment Research, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Feng Qiu, Department of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China, Email ndyfy01149@ncu.edu.cn Ke Fang, Department of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China, Email fangkeqq88@163.com

Background: The relationship between molecular phenotype and prognosis in high-grade gliomas (WHO III and IV, HGG) treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is not fully understood and needs further exploration.
Methods: The HGG patients following surgery and treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to assess the independent prognostic factors. The nomogram model was established, and its accuracy was determined via the calibration plots.
Results: A total of 215 and 88 patients had grade III glioma and grade IV glioma, respectively. Grade III oligodendroglioma (OG-G3) patients had the longest mPFS and mOS than other grade III pathology, while grade III astrocytoma (AA-G3) patients were close to IDH-1 wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) and had a poor prognosis. The IDH-1 mutant group had a better mPFS and mOS than the IDH-1 wildtype group in all grade III patients, OG-G3 and AA-G3 patients. Furthermore, 1p/19q co-deletion group had a longer mPFS and mOS than 1p/19q non-deletion group in all grade III patients. IDH-1 mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion patients had the best prognosis than other molecular types. Also, the MGMT methylation and IDH-1 mutation or 1p/19q co-deletion group had a longer mPFS and mOS than the MGMT unmethylation and IDH-1 wildtype or 1p/19q non-codeletion of grade III patients. In addition, the low Ki-67 expression group had a better prognosis than high Ki-67 expression group in grade III patients. Univariate and multivariate COX showed that 1p/19q co-deletion and MGMT methylation were the independent prognostic factors for mPFS and mOS. The calibration curve showed that the established nomogram could well predict the survival based on these covariates.
Conclusion: The AA-G3 with IDH-1 wildtype, MGMT unmethylation or 1p/19q non-codeletion patients was resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has a poor prognosis and needs a more active treatment.

Keywords: glioma, radiotherapy, prognosis, nomogram