论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
血清消退素D2作为中重度创伤性脑损伤后严重程度评估和预后预测的生化标志物的新意义:一项前瞻性队列研究
Authors Zong H, Zong Y, Li J, Zhao S, Wu W, Chen R, Zhao G, Li Z
Received 17 September 2024
Accepted for publication 6 December 2024
Published 10 January 2025 Volume 2025:21 Pages 53—65
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S489563
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jun Chen
Hua Zong,* Yaqiong Zong,* Jian Li, Shaoyun Zhao, Weipeng Wu, Runhong Chen, Guoan Zhao, Zhuolun Li
Department of Neurosurgery, Changzhi People’s Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Jian Li, Department of Neurosurgery, Changzhi People’s Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China, Email lijian958801@163.com
Background: Resolvin D2 (RvD2), which exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, is neuroprotective. This study aimed to ascertain the potential of serum RvD2 level as a prognostic predictor of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI).
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, serum RvD2 levels were measured in 136 patients with msTBI and 100 healthy controls. The severity scoring systems encompassed the Rotterdam computed tomography classification and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Post-trauma six-month Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was deemed an outcome indicator, with GOS scores below 4 indicating poor prognosis. Sequential univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the correlative factors of changeable serum RvD2 levels and the predictors of adverse prognosis.
Results: Patients displayed a marked decline in serum RvD2 levels compared to controls (median, 95.2 versus 252.8 pg/mL; P< 0.001). Serum RvD2 levels were independently correlated with GCS scores (beta, 8.989; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.678– 14.280; P=0.001) and Rotterdam scores (beta, − 14.676; 95% CI, − 25.885--3.468; P=0.011), and were independently associated with continuous GOS scores (beta, 0.004; 95% CI, 0.002– 0.007; P=0.003), ordinal GOS scores (odds ratio, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002– 1.015; P=0.015), and poor prognosis (odds ratio, 0.991; 95% CI, 0.983– 0.999; P=0.037) at the six-month mark. A linear correlation was observed between serum RvD2 levels and the likelihood of poor prognosis (P for nonlinear = 0.090). Serum RvD2 levels exhibited strong discrimination efficiency for the probability of poor prognosis (P< 0.001), with similar ability as Rotterdam scores (P=0.337) and GCS scores (P=0.300). The integrative model encompassing serum RvD2, Rotterdam scores and GCS scores performed well using a series of statistical methods.
Conclusion: A significant decrease in serum RvD2 levels after msTBI may accurately indicate trauma severity and efficiently distinguish the possibility of poor neurological outcomes in msTBI, signifying that serum RvD2 may be of clinical significance in the prognostic prediction of TBI.
Keywords: resolvin 2, traumatic brain injury, prognosis, severity, biomarkers