论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
一种预测脑出血后肺炎风险的新Nomogram
Authors Sun Y, Zhang L, Huang B, He Q , Hu B
Received 22 September 2024
Accepted for publication 22 January 2025
Published 30 January 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1333—1351
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S490064
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Yuanyuan Sun,* Lei Zhang,* Baisong Huang, Quanwei He, Bo Hu
Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Quanwei He; Bo Hu, Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan , 430022, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8613554111043 ; +8613707114863, Email hequanwei2008@126.com; hubo@mail.hust.edu.cn
Background: Pneumonia is among the most dangerous complications of infection after intracerebral hemorrhage. We aimed to create a novel nomogram for pneumonia after intracerebral hemorrhage.
Methods and Results: The data from the Chinese Cerebral Hemorrhage: Mechanism and Intervention (CHEERY) study was analyzed. Thirty percent of qualified patients were placed in the validation group (n=763) while seventy percent of them were randomly placed in the training group (n=1784). In the multivariate analysis, ten variables were included in the model: age (β= 0.023, P< 0.001), hospital days (β=0.392, P< 0.001), baseline mRS score (β=0.484, P< 0.001), baseline GCS score (β=− 0.285, P< 0.001), hs-CRP (β=0.328, P< 0.001), hematoma volume (β=0.376, P< 0.001), brainstem hemorrhage (β=0.956, P=0.002), intraventricular hemorrhage (β=0.629, P=0.001), and β-blocker (β=0.899, P< 0.001) In the training subset, the areas under curve were 0.805 (95% CI, 0.773– 0.833). The model was subsequently examined in the validation group, with the area under curve 0.767 (95% CI, 0.716– 0.807). There was strong agreement between the anticipated and actual survival rates in the nomogram calibration curves for both the training and validation groups. The clinical value of the model is assessed by means of Decision Curve Analysis. In addition, we validated other models with this cohort, which showed that our model had better discrimination. Moreover, the area under the curve of the catboost model established using the above nine variables in the training set and the validation set is 0.87(95% CI, 0.80– 0.90) and 0.77(95% CI, 0.72– 0.80).
Conclusion: We have established a simple and easy predictive tool. By evaluating the incidence of pneumonia after intracerebral hemorrhage, we can identify high-risk groups early. At the same time, our study also suggests that doctors should be cautious in the use of β-blocker in clinical decision-making.
Keywords: pneumonia, inflammation, intracerebral hemorrhage, nomogram, β-blocker