论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
宏基因组二代测序(mNGS)与传统微生物检测(cmt)在hiv感染者病原体鉴定中的比较
Authors Zhu X, Cao L, Wang J, Lu X, Huang Z, Wen X, Bian L, Wu C, Zou M
Received 19 September 2024
Accepted for publication 22 January 2025
Published 17 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 929—940
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S491946
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sandip Patil
Xiaohong Zhu, Li Cao, Juan Wang, Xuefeng Lu, Zuoyu Huang, Xiaoping Wen, Lihong Bian, Congxia Wu, Meiyin Zou
The Third Affiliated Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 223001, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Congxia Wu; Meiyin Zou, Email fellowshipmskcc@gmail.com; meiyinzou@aol.com
Background: The rapid and accurate identification of infectious pathogens in HIV-infected patients remains a challenge. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a panpathogen assay for rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases. Here, the diagnostic value of mNGS was evaluated in HIV-infected patients and compared with conventional microbiological tests (CMTs).
Methods: This study was conducted on 216 hIV-infected patients with suspected opportunistic infections. Infectious pathogen detection was done by mNGS and conventional microbiological tests, respectively.
Results: A total of 195 patients (90.2%) were positive for microbial pathogens by mNGS, while 135 patients (62.5%) were positive for microbial pathogens by CMTs. Mixed infection was identified in 92 patients by mNGS, and 41 patients were detected with mixed infection by CMTs. Fungi and virus mixed infection was the most frequent pattern detected by mNGS (32, 14.8%) and CMTs (22, 10.2%). The CD4+ T cell count in patients with mixed pathogens was significantly lower than that in patients infected with a single pathogen. Pathogens were quickly identified by mNGS in 151 patients (69.9%), and appropriate treatments were initiated. In 47 patients antibacterial agents were adjusted based on mNGS results, in 39 patients antifungal agents were changed, and 35 patients had antiviral agents added.
Conclusion: mNGS is a valuable tool and enhances rapid microbiological identification in HIV-infected patients. Combined with CMTs, mNGS may facilitate personalized antimicrobial treatment strategies and increase survival.
Keywords: metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), HIV, conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), antimicrobial treatment