论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
基于超声粘弹性成像的增殖性狼疮性肾炎无创定量评估
Authors Yuan H, Chen Y, Wei L, Liao X, Gao Y
Received 3 December 2024
Accepted for publication 27 February 2025
Published 6 March 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 3269—3281
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S505223
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Xiaoyu Liu
Han Yuan, Yuanyuan Chen, Liyan Wei, Xinhong Liao, Yong Gao
Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Yong Gao, Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 15977486866, Email yonggaogx@163.com
Objective: To evaluate the role of ultrasonic viscoelastic imaging in predicting proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN).
Methods: We prospectively used ultrasonic viscoelastic imaging to evaluate 143 patients with lupus nephritis (LN), who underwent kidney biopsies from May 2023 to June 2024. Sixty healthy volunteers served as the control group. Patients were categorized as 90 cases of PLN, and 53 cases of nonproliferative lupus nephritis (nPLN). Ultrasonic viscoelastic imaging was employed to quantitatively analyze kidney cortex elasticity (Emean), viscosity coefficient (Vmean) and dispersion coefficient (Dmean). Semi-quantitative assessment of the lesion tissues was conducted based on the activity index and chronic index scoring system established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2018. The relationship among clinicopathological, conventional ultrasound factors and viscoelastic parameters was evaluated.
Results: Viscoelastic parameters (Emean, Vmean, and Dmean) significantly differed among the healthy control, PLN, and nPLN groups (all p < 0.05). The viscoelastic parameters (Emean, Vmean, and Dmean) of the PLN and nPLN groups exceeded those of the control group. Vmean and Dmean were considerably greater in the PLN group than in the nPLN group (p < 0.05). Vmean (OR 89.49, p = 0.002), serum creatinine (Scr) (OR 110.57, p = 0.024), and anti-dsDNA (OR 1.0, p = 0.015) were significant predictors of PLN. The combined model’s area under curve (AUC) for predicting PLN was 0.83, better than any single indicator (p < 0.05). The peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the interlobar artery was determining factor of Emean (p < 0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), activity index, and body mass index (BMI) were determining factors of Dmean, while activity index was the determining factor of Vmean (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis reveals a positive correlation between Vmean and both the activity index and the chronicity index (r = 0.57 and r = 0.34, respectively, p < 0.05), as well as between Dmean and both the activity index and the chronicity index (r = 0.43 and r = 0.20, respectively, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: As a noninvasive examination method, ultrasonic viscoelastic imaging is beneficial for identifying PLN.
Keywords: viscosity, elasticity, lupus nephritis, proliferative lupus nephritis, active index, chronic index