已发表论文

未行再灌注治疗的急性心肌梗死患者心肌内出血的前瞻性研究

 

Authors Li M, Wu Z, Tudahun I, Zhang K

Received 11 November 2024

Accepted for publication 28 February 2025

Published 11 March 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1393—1401

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S501504

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Yuriy Sirenko

Muzheng Li,1 Zhijian Wu,2 Ilyas Tudahun,3 Kun Zhang1 

1Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Cardiology, Changsha Third People’s Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Kun Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China, Email zhangkun@sysush.com

Background and Aims: IMH commonly presents in STEMI patients receiving reperfusion therapy and is considered as an ischemic reperfusion injury. However, it is unclear whether IMH occurs in AMI patients without reperfusion therapy.
Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with STEMI and 41 patients with NSTEMI admitted to the CCU of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2020 to November 2021, all of whom did not receive reperfusion therapy. In the STEMI group, 16 patients were detected with IMH by CMR. However, in the NSTEMI group, only 3 patients were detected. The incidence of IMH was significantly higher in patients with STEMI than NSTEMI (16/40 vs 3/41, P < 0.001). Among patients with STEMI, the incidence of IMH was not significantly different between patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and those who did not (16/40 vs 27/65, P = 0.876). Patients in the spontaneous reperfusion group had a higher incidence of IMH than patients in the non-spontaneous reperfusion group (11/23 vs 5/17, P = 0.240). Similarly, in patients with STEMI who did not receive reperfusion therapy, the incidence of MACE was higher in the IMH-present group than in the IMH-absent group (5/16 vs 2/24, P = 0.063).
Conclusion: The incidence of IMH is comparable in patients with STEMI with or without reperfusion therapy, but considerably higher than that in NSTEMI patients. Patients with STEMI can present with IMH even when infarct-related vessel flow is not restored.

Keywords: myocardial infarction, intramyocardial hemorrhage, outcome, reperfusion therapy