论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
关于盆腔淤血综合征患者应用可脱性弹簧圈栓塞术的临床疗效及对卵巢储备功能影响的回顾性分析
Authors Wang P, Zheng XL, Wang YH, Tao Y, Wang WC
Received 19 December 2024
Accepted for publication 18 March 2025
Published 4 April 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1945—1955
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S513288
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sarah Cipriani
Peng Wang,1,2 Xiang-Long Zheng,1 Yu-Huan Wang,1 Yun Tao,2 Wan-Chun Wang3
1Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Wan-Chun Wang, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, 445 Bayi Avenue, Nanchang City, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China, Email wwjx7469108@163.com
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects and the efficacy of a combination of interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy for Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients diagnosed with PCS, and divided them into three groups based on their therapeutic schedule. The visual analog scale (VAS), pelvic venous blood flow parameters, and serum hormone levels of the three groups were compared before and after treatment. Moreover, the clinical efficacy and long-term changes in ovarian reserve functions were analyzed. For the comparison of measurement data before and after treatment within the group, paired - sample t - test was used for analysis. For the comparison between groups, one - way analysis of variance was applied. A P - value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.
Results: Patients in the study group had significantly lower pain degrees than in the control group I and the control group II at 24 h and the first month after the operation (p < 0.05). The degree of pain in patients in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group I at the third and 6 months following the treatment (p < 0.05). The parameters of venous blood flow and ovarian reserve in patients treated with the combined endocrine hormone therapy were significantly better than those in patients not treated with endocrine hormone therapy (p < 0.05). The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: A combination of precise interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy can rapidly and effectively relieve pain in patients with PCS. Compared with free coil embolization, this combination can effectively increase vascular tension, reduce congestion, inhibit ovarian function, reduce pelvic congestion, and relieve symptoms.
Keywords: endocrine hormone therapy, interventional embolization, interlock detachable coil, ovarian reserve function, pelvic congestion syndrome