论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修手术临床结局影响因素的回顾性分析
Authors Cao X, Zhao Z, Zhang C, Gao B, Dong R, Ma L
Received 14 January 2025
Accepted for publication 13 May 2025
Published 12 June 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2977—2986
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S517567
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Sandip Patil
Xuyang Cao,1 Zizi Zhao,2 Cheng Zhang,3 Bo Gao,1 Ruifang Dong,2 Lijie Ma1
1Trauma Center, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Orthopedics, North China Medical and Health Group Xingtai General Hospital, Xingtai, Hebei, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Orthopedics, The First Central Hospital of Baoding City, Baoding, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Lijie Ma, Trauma Center, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 102 Youyi North Street, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-17733299114, Email malijie305x@hebmu.edu.cn
Objective: To identify factors influencing clinical outcomes of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA).
Methods: This retrospective study included 40 patients who underwent UKA revision for PJI (May 2009–May 2023). Patients were divided into responders (n=27, favorable outcomes: no infection, KSS ≥ 80, HSS ≥ 85 at 6 months) and non-responders (n=13, suboptimal outcomes: persistent infection or KSS < 80/HSS < 85). Inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of success.
Results: Non-responders had higher rates of diabetes (46.2% vs 14.8%), smoking (30.8% vs 18.5%), alcohol use (23.1% vs 14.8%), Gram-positive infections (30.8% vs 11.1%), and deep infections (84.6% vs 22.2%, all P< 0.05). Key predictors of success included optimal antibiotic management (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.02– 1.74), patient compliance (OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.08– 1.92), and absence of diabetes (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.24– 1.98), smoking (OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.08– 2.37), or Gram-positive infections (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.12– 1.90, all P< 0.05).
Conclusion: Diabetes, smoking, alcohol use, Gram-positive infections, deep infection, antibiotic management, and compliance significantly impact UKA revision outcomes. Smoking showed the strongest association (OR=1.60). Clinicians should prioritize preoperative optimization (glycemic control, smoking cessation) and protocol-driven antibiotic use. Findings are exploratory due to small sample size and require validation in larger cohorts.
Keywords: unicondylar knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic infection, revision surgery, clinical outcomes, influencing factors