论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
《中国版患者参与度量表(PPS-C)在内科患者中的验证:一项心理测量学研究》
Authors Wang W, He H, Bao L, Wu M
Received 18 January 2025
Accepted for publication 14 May 2025
Published 10 June 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 1703—1715
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S518317
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang
Wenqin Wang,1 Hongmei He,2 Liyun Bao,2 Minjuan Wu1
1School of Medicine, Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, The First People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Lin’an District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Minjuan Wu, Quzhou College of Technology, No. 18 Jiangyuan Road, Baiyun Street, Kecheng District, Quzhou, 324000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 17764554463, Email wuminjuan83@126.com
Objective: To translate the Patient Participation Scale (PPS) into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties among internal medicine patients in a tertiary hospital in China, providing a reliable tool for enhancing patient participation in healthcare decisions.
Background: Patient participation is critical for patient-centered care, widely proven to enhance healthcare quality and improve health outcomes. While China increasingly recognizes the importance of patient participation in clinical decision-making, evidence-based interventions remain limited, partly due to the lack of validated measurement tools. The original PPS has demonstrated promise in assessing patient participation, but its application in China requires cultural adaptation to ensure conceptual and linguistic equivalence.
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: The Brislin’s translation model was followed to translate the PPS. A convenience sample of 457 internal medicine patients in a tertiary hospital was recruited. Validity was calculated by content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity, and convergence validity. Reliability was analyzed through internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability.
Results: The content validity index was 0.914. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a significantly good fit for a four-factor model (χ2/df = 3.826, RMSEA = 0.079, CFI = 0.922, GFI = 0.862, AGFI = 0.825, NFI = 0.897, SRMR = 0.043, TLI = 0.910). The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.953, and the dimensions ranged from 0.759 to 0.910. The positive correlation between the Chinese version of the Patient Participation Scale (PPS-C) and Inpatients Involvement in Medication Safety Behavior Scale indicated acceptable convergent validity (r = 0.454). The positive correlation between the PPS-C and Health Literacy Management Scale indicated acceptable concurrent validity (r = 0.217). Scores differed significantly by household income and marital status. Test–retest reliability was 0.906.
Conclusion: The PPS-C has good reliability and validity, which can be applied to the assessment of the participation levels of internal medicine patients in China.
Keywords: cross-cultural adaptation, quality of life, patient participation, reliability, validity