论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
颈椎相邻两节段脊椎病采用前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与前路颈椎次全切除融合术(ACCF)治疗的中期功能恢复情况比较研究
Authors Wang X, Huang D, Han J, Luo J, Wang Y
Received 31 December 2024
Accepted for publication 31 May 2025
Published 17 June 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 3009—3016
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S515112
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor King Hei Stanley Lam
Xinyang Wang, Dingan Huang, Jianbang Han, Junjie Luo, Yingfeng Wang
Department of Spine Surgery, Peoples’ Hospital of Huangshan City, Huangshan, Anhui, 245000, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Yingfeng Wang, Department of Spine Surgery, Peoples’ Hospital of Huangshan City, No. 4 Liyuan Road, Tunxi District, Huangshan, Anhui, 245000, People’s Republic of China, Email wxyang315@163.com
Objective: This study aims to comparatively analyze the mid-term functional recovery following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of adjacent two-level cervical spondylosis.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 123 patients with adjacent two-level cervical spondylosis treated at our hospital between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into the ACCF group (n=63) and the ACDF group (n=60) according to the surgical method. The clinical outcomes, surgical details, mid-term functional recovery, cervical Cobb angle (C2-7), overall cervical range of motion (ROM) (C2-7), adjacent segment ROM (upper and lower adjacent segments), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups before surgery and at the final follow-up.
Results: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences between the groups in JOA, VAS, and NDI scores (P > 0.05). The ACDF group had shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and lower postoperative drainage volume compared to the ACCF group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was also lower in the ACDF group (P < 0.05). At 18 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant improvement compared to their preoperative status (P < 0.05), with no significant differences in the rate of excellent and good outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cervical Cobb angle, overall cervical ROM, or ROM of the upper and lower adjacent segments (P > 0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both ACDF and ACCF are effective surgical options for patients with adjacent two-level cervical spondylosis, improving cervical function and alleviating pain. However, both procedures are associated with a certain incidence of complications and a reduction in cervical mobility postoperatively. Comparatively, ACDF offers advantages in terms of shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and lower postoperative drainage volume.
Keywords: two-level cervical spondylosis, double discectomy, partial corpectomy, cervical function, pain