论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
2 型糖尿病患者抑郁症状、社会支持与糖尿病困扰的网络分析:一项横断面研究
Authors Chen H, Dong X, Chen S, Chen X, Lu X, He J, Ji W, Hou C, Bai D, Gao J
Received 10 February 2025
Accepted for publication 28 June 2025
Published 8 July 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 1951—1964
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S521735
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Huan Chen,* Xiaohui Dong,* Shi Chen,* Xinyu Chen, Xianying Lu, Jiali He, Wenting Ji, Chaoming Hou, Dingxi Bai, Jing Gao
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Dingxi Bai, Email 964975571@qq.com Jing Gao, Email 19942021@cdutcm.edu.cn
Background: Diabetes distress (DD) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Little is known about the complex intercorrelations between different components of depressive symptoms (DS), social support (SS), and DD. This study aimed to identify the central components of DD and to examine the interconnectedness between DS, SS, and DD components.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was employed in this study. We investigated 886 patients with T2D from two diabetes centers. The Chinese versions of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used. GGM was employed to estimate the network model. We identified central and bridge symptoms based on betweenness, closeness, and node strength centrality. The stability and accuracy of the network were examined using the case-dropping and bootstrapped procedures.
Results: Three items (“Do not have doctor I can see regularly”, “Doctor does not give clear directions”, and “Doctor does not know about diabetes”) in the network of DD exhibited the highest strength centrality. The DD-DS-SS network exhibited four strong positive bridges and two strong negative bridges. The stability and accuracy tests demonstrated that the two networks were robust.
Conclusion: Physician-related distress may contribute to the development and maintenance of DD. Fatigue, diet, and social interaction summarize the complex link between DD and DS. Furthermore, subjective support and support utilization of patients with T2D were closely related to the DD. These provided more targeted theoretical guidance and a scientific basis for psychological counseling and intervention in patients with T2D.
Keywords: diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, social support, type 2 diabetes, network analysis