论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
重症监护病房中家庭成员与医生在共同决策过程中的对话:一项定性观察研究
Authors Lu Q, Ji J, Lu XY, Yin QH, Yang YQ
Received 28 February 2025
Accepted for publication 24 July 2025
Published 31 July 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4535—4550
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S525581
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 5
Editor who approved publication: Dr Laura Schwab-Reese
Qing Lu,1,* Juan Ji,2,* Xiao-yan Lu,1 Qiong-Hua Yin,1 Yi-Qun Yang3
1Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Outpatient, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Yi-Qun Yang, Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Road, Gu Su Qu, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86051213656245355, Email 592436680@qq.com
Introduction: It is necessary to understand the decision-making dynamics between physicians and families so as to help families better participate in shared decision-making.
Methods: A qualitative observational research was conducted. Conversations between physicians and families at a tertiary care hospital from July to December 2022 were audio-recorded. The families were those with critically ill patients lacking decision-making capacity in the intensive care unit. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis method.
Results: A total of 40 conversations were analyzed. There were 12, 15, and 13 decisions made on the day of hospital admission, when the patient’s condition changed, and during the end-of-life situation, respectively. In all decision-making stages, some sharing of information occurred between physicians and families. The degree of sharing differed depending on the decision-making context. In end-of-life situations, decision-making mostly involved families, which might only represent the values and preferences from family members but not patients.
Conclusion: Evidence of shared decision-making between physicians and family members was low. The levels of shared decision-making varied according to the context in which decisions were made. The shared decision-making between physicians and families might only represent the values and preferences from family members but not patients. Family members often faced decision-making difficulties and regrets.
Keywords: shared decision-making, critical illness, physician–patient relationship, family, intensive care unit