已发表论文

术前脊柱颅骨角可预测单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变

 

Authors Li Y, Cheng P, Zhang X, Cheng C

Received 10 April 2025

Accepted for publication 3 July 2025

Published 28 July 2025 Volume 2025:17 Pages 361—371

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S533548

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Clark Hung

Yong Li, Peiyan Cheng, Xiaolei Zhang, Cai Cheng

Department of Spinal Surgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, 061000, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Cai Cheng, Email chengcaispine123@163.com

Background: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a common complication after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). The spino cranial angle (SCA), a novel sagittal parameter reflecting head-to-cervical alignment, may be associated with ASD, yet its predictive value remains unclear.
Methods: A total of 98 patients who underwent single-level ACDF with at least 24 months of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into ASD and non-ASD groups based on established radiographic criteria. Pre- and postoperative cervical sagittal parameters, including SCA, T1 slope (T1s), sagittal segmental alignment (SSA), sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS), and C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) were measured. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Multivariate logistic regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of ASD.
Results: ASD occurred in 36 patients (36.7%). Preoperative SCA was significantly larger in the ASD group compared to the non-ASD group (86.7° ± 7.4° vs 80.5° ± 6.9°, p < 0.001), while T1s and SSA were significantly smaller (p = 0.015 and p = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative SCA as the only independent risk factor for ASD (OR = 1.279, 95% CI: 1.010– 1.619, p = 0.041). Patients with SCA > 84.2° showed a significantly higher incidence of ASD (55.8% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that SCA had good predictive value for ASD development. No significant differences were observed in JOA, NDI, or VAS scores between the two groups at final follow-up.
Conclusion: Preoperative SCA is a significant predictor of ASD, and may be considered in preoperative risk assessment.

Keywords: spino cranial angle, adjacent segment degeneration, anterior cervical decompression and fusion, cervical sagittal alignment