已发表论文

单次注射收肌管阻滞与持续输注相比可增强单间室膝关节置换术患者的早期活动且镇痛效果相当:一项回顾性队列研究

 

Authors Lan F, Chong Y, Liu F, Wang T 

Received 6 February 2025

Accepted for publication 26 July 2025

Published 1 August 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 3851—3858

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S512475

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Dr Karina Gritsenko

Fei Lan,* Yuhan Chong,* Fangyan Liu, Tianlong Wang

Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Fangyan Liu, Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18500372835, Email xiami0104@126.com Tianlong Wang, Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13910525304, Email w_tl5595@hotmail.com

Objective: Adductor canal block (ACB) is commonly used for postoperative analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the comparative benefits of single-injection ACB (SACB) versus continuous ACB (CACB) remain unclear.
Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing unilateral, primary UKA were allocated to group CACB or group SACB from January 2016 to December 2023. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Secondary outcomes included the additional analgesic therapy, activity score, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), complications, and length of stay (LOS).
Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative pain score, 35 patients were included in each group (SACB and CACB). At 24 hours postoperatively, the SACB group had a slightly higher VAS pain score compared with the CACB group, though this difference was not statistically significant. The Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) activity score was significantly higher in the SACB group (p = 0.02), and the LOS was significantly shorter by approximately 3 days compared to the CACB group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of additional analgesic therapy, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), PONV, or complications.
Discussion: CACB did not significantly reduce postoperative pain or improve functional outcomes over three months after UKA compared to SACB. However, SACB was associated with improved immediate postoperative mobility and a shorter LOS, suggesting potential benefits for early recovery.

Keywords: unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, pain control, adductor canal block