已发表论文

华氏巨球蛋白血症患者及其家属对其的认知、态度和行为实践

 

Authors Yang Y, Gu X, Zhang E, He J, Cai Z

Received 26 January 2025

Accepted for publication 15 July 2025

Published 12 August 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4359—4367

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S519598

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Dana Kristjansson

Yang Yang,1,* Xiaolin Gu,1,2,* Enfan Zhang,1 Jingsong He,1 Zhen Cai1 

1Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Hematology, Putuo People’s Hospital, Zhoushan, Zhejiang, 316100, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Zhen Cai, Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13857190311, Email caiz@zju.edu.cn

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) among patients and their family members, and to compare differences between these two groups.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in October 27, 2023 to Nov 27, 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province, targeting WM patients and their family members. Demographic characteristics and KAP scores were collected through self-administered questionnaires.
Results: A total of 220 valid questionnaires were analyzed, with 98 (44.55%) from patients. The overall mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 10.38± 4.07 (possible range: 0– 16), 15.78± 2.34 (possible range: 5– 25), and 23.19± 3.31 (possible range: 6– 30), respectively. Patients had significantly higher knowledge scores than family members (11.13± 4.28 vs 9.78± 3.79, P = 0.004), while no significant differences were found in attitude (15.78± 2.27 vs 15.77± 2.40, P = 0.889) or practice scores (23.59± 2.94 vs 22.87± 3.56, P = 0.134). Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.1879, P = 0.0052) and practice (r = 0.1670, P = 0.0132). However, the correlation between attitudes and practices was not significant. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results showed no direct effect between knowledge and attitude (P = 0.312) or knowledge and practice (P = 0.067). In contrast, attitude directly and negatively affected practice (β = − 0.10, P = 0.036).
Conclusion: WM patients and their family members demonstrated moderate levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward WM. To enhance clinical outcomes, interventions should focus on improving attitudes, given their direct and negative impact on practices.

Keywords: knowledge, attitude, practices, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, family members