已发表论文

胸椎旁阻滞中使用脂质体布比卡因与普通布比卡因在胸腔镜肺切除术患者中的比较:一项随机对照研究

 

Authors Yang Z , Liu M, Wang C, Song Y, Wu J, Wu D, Yao M, Yang Y, Miao C, Liang C

Received 3 April 2025

Accepted for publication 2 August 2025

Published 12 August 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 6955—6964

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S532122

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 5

Editor who approved publication: Professor Anastasios Lymperopoulos

Zhen Yang,1,2,* Manman Liu,1,* Chengyu Wang,3,* Yuejiao Song,1 Junmei Wu,1 Dan Wu,1 Minmin Yao,3 Yan Yang,3 Changhong Miao,3 Chao Liang3 

1Department of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Chao Liang; Changhong Miao, Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-021-64041990, Email superwm226@126.com; miao.changhong@zs-hospital.sh.cn

Background: The effectiveness of a thoracic paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic surgery pain management is not well examined. This study compared the effects of liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine on a thoracic paravertebral blockade in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
Methods: Consenting participants (114) scheduled for VATS were randomly assigned to thoracic paravertebral blockade at T4– 5 and T7-8 levels with 20 mL (266 mg) liposomal bupivacaine (LB) or 20 mL (37.5 mg) plain bupivacaine (PB) groups. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption at 48 hours postoperatively. Additional main outcomes included the opioid consumption 24 and 72 hours postoperatively; the pain score at rest and coughing 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively; Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores 24 hours postoperatively, the time to the first analgesia request.
Results: Opioid consumption did not differ between the groups at 48 hours postoperatively. The QoR-15 scores 24 hours after surgery were higher in the LB group than in the PB group (mean [SD], 120.2 [7.1] vs 116.5 [7.8]; P = 0.009). The time to the first analgesia request was longer in the LB group than in the PB group (mean [SD], 585.8min [211.7] vs 315.3min [101.7]; P < 0.001). The areas under the curve for the NRS score at rest were 21.2 and 35.8 for the LB and PB groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The NRS scores during coughing did not differ between the two groups, nor did the CPSP three months postoperatively.
Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine offers limited but measurable clinical benefits when used for thoracic paravertebral blockade in patients undergoing VATS.
Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Registration number: ChiCTR2400081544, URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=221025.

Keywords: liposomal bupivacaine, paravertebral block, video-assisted thoracic surgery, chronic postsurgical pain