已发表论文

罗哌卡因-舒芬太尼用于电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的最佳程序化间歇硬膜外推注间隔:一项偏币上下法研究

 

Authors Feng C , Wen J, Lai G, Lu X, Luo G, Lu Y, Li W, Lai R 

Received 3 May 2025

Accepted for publication 12 August 2025

Published 20 August 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 7207—7214

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S538163

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Muzammal Hussain

Chengfei Feng,1,* Jijin Wen,2,* Guozhong Lai,3,* Xiaofan Lu,2 Guanli Luo,2 Yali Lu,2 Wei Li,2 Renchun Lai2 

1Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Renchun Lai, Email lairch@sysucc.org.cn Wei Li, Email liw@sysucc.org.cn

Purpose: Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is a novel epidural anesthesia technique for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, the optimal setting of the PIEB parameters remains to be determined. This study aimed to determine the optimal time interval for the PIEB regimen of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.15% with sufentanil 0.4 μg/mL within 24 hours of VATS lobectomy.
Patients and Methods: We conducted a double-blind, sequential allocation trial with a biased-coin up-down design. 42 patients scheduled for VATS lobectomy were enrolled in the study. All participants received a fixed programmed bolus dose of 10 mL of 0.15% ropivacaine combined with 0.4 μg/mL sufentanil. The PIEB interval was initially set at 180 minutes for the first patient and adjusted for subsequent patients according to the biased-coin design, with intervals of 180, 150, 120, and 90 minutes (corresponding to groups 180, 150, 120, and 90, respectively). The primary outcome was the achievement of effective analgesia, defined as the absence of any requirement for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or additional rescue analgesic interventions within 24 hours after the loading dose. Secondary outcomes included the documentation of postoperative adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, pruritus, and dizziness.
Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. Using Isotonic Regression analysis, the estimated effective interval for 90% (EI90) of patients was determined to be 97.4 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.6– 103.1 minutes). The incidence of postoperative hypotension varied significantly across groups, with the highest probability observed in group 90 (64.3%), followed by group 120 (18.8%) and group 150 (11.1%).
Conclusion: The estimated effective interval for the EI90 between PIEB of 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.15% with sufentanil 0.4 μg/mL was approximately 100 minutes.
Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300077174.

Keywords: epidural analgesia, programmed intermittent epidural bolus, time interval, video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy