已发表论文

关于远程康复治疗慢性脊柱疼痛的卫生经济学评价的系统综述

 

Authors Cai M, Ku X, Xu L , Liu F

Received 16 May 2025

Accepted for publication 2 August 2025

Published 21 August 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4251—4262

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S533280

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Giuliano Lo Bianco

Mengliang Cai,1,* Xiong Ku,2,* Licai Xu,1,* Fan Liu1,* 

1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hubei No. 3 People’s Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan City, 430030 People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan City, 430030 People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Licai Xu, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hubei No. 3 People’s Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan City, 430030, People’s Republic of China, Email licaixu112@gmail.com

Background: Telerehabilitation can improve clinical outcomes by increasing access to and adherence to rehabilitation protocols, leading to favourable benefits in overall quality of life at a reasonable cost. This systematic review aims to conduct a thorough analysis of published health economic evaluations of standalone telerehabilitation interventions for individuals with chronic spinal pain, focusing on reported costs and clinical outcomes.
Methods: An extensive search was conducted in English across four general medical databases and three health economic databases. The studies’ quality was evaluated using the updated Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
Results: Five economic evaluations were identified, comprising three high-quality and two medium-quality studies. Among these studies, four indicated that telerehabilitation interventions were more cost-effective than standard treatment and conventional physical therapy from a social and healthcare perspective. The sixth study, which lacked a comparison group, also demonstrated that the use of remote follow-ups and programming for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) devices in chronic spinal pain is cost-effective.
Conclusion: Telerehabilitation, particularly telerehabilitation-based McKenzie therapy (TBMT), may represent the most economically efficient approach compared to conventional treatment interventions for individuals with chronic lumbar spine pain. For a more robust conclusion, it is imperative to conduct comprehensive economic evaluations using larger sample sizes over extended periods across multiple countries.

Keywords: chronic spinal pain, low back pain, health economic evaluation, telerehabilitation, telerehabilitation-based McKenzie therapy