已发表论文

威克汉姆原藻与嗜血分枝杆菌混合感染所致复发性皮下脓肿:宏基因组下一代测序误诊为麻风病

 

Authors Jiang L, Wei L, Li X, Zheng D, Cao C, Li M 

Received 28 May 2025

Accepted for publication 24 August 2025

Published 10 September 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4827—4831

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S536182

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Chi H. Lee

Li Jiang,1– 3,* Lili Wei,1– 3,* Xiuying Li,1– 3 Dongyan Zheng,1– 3 Cunwei Cao,1– 3 Meng Li2,4 

1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Mycosis Prevention and Treatment, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Fangchenggang Wanqing Institute of Mycosis Prevention and Control, Fangchenggang, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Meng Li, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 771 5356052, Email gxmulimeng@foxmail.com Cunwei Cao, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 771 5356514, Email caocunwei@yeah.net

Abstract: Protothecawickerhamii (P. wickerhamii) and Mycobacteriumhaemophilum (M. haemophilum) are both opportunistic pathogens that could cause infections in immunocompromised populations. However, these infections rarely occur in individuals with normal immunity. We reported a 39-year-old immunocompetent man presented with recurrent subcutaneous abscess on fingers who developed a co-infection of P. wickerhamii and M. haemophilum. To our knowledge, this is the first reported co-infection involving P. wickerhamii and M. haemophilum. The diagnosis was complicated by mNGS misidentifying M. haemophilum as Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) (98% sequence similarity) and overlooking P. wickerhamii. This case underscores the critical need to correlate mNGS results with clinical features and use complementary diagnostic methods to avoid errors. The combination of traditional and molecular methods can improve diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: metagenomic next-generation sequencing, Prototheca wickerhamii, Mycobacterium haemophilum, co-infection