论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
威克汉姆原藻与嗜血分枝杆菌混合感染所致复发性皮下脓肿:宏基因组下一代测序误诊为麻风病
Authors Jiang L, Wei L, Li X, Zheng D, Cao C, Li M
Received 28 May 2025
Accepted for publication 24 August 2025
Published 10 September 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 4827—4831
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S536182
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Chi H. Lee
Li Jiang,1– 3,* Lili Wei,1– 3,* Xiuying Li,1– 3 Dongyan Zheng,1– 3 Cunwei Cao,1– 3 Meng Li2,4
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Mycosis Prevention and Treatment, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Fangchenggang Wanqing Institute of Mycosis Prevention and Control, Fangchenggang, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Meng Li, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 771 5356052, Email gxmulimeng@foxmail.com Cunwei Cao, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 771 5356514, Email caocunwei@yeah.net
Abstract: Protothecawickerhamii (P. wickerhamii) and Mycobacteriumhaemophilum (M. haemophilum) are both opportunistic pathogens that could cause infections in immunocompromised populations. However, these infections rarely occur in individuals with normal immunity. We reported a 39-year-old immunocompetent man presented with recurrent subcutaneous abscess on fingers who developed a co-infection of P. wickerhamii and M. haemophilum. To our knowledge, this is the first reported co-infection involving P. wickerhamii and M. haemophilum. The diagnosis was complicated by mNGS misidentifying M. haemophilum as Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) (98% sequence similarity) and overlooking P. wickerhamii. This case underscores the critical need to correlate mNGS results with clinical features and use complementary diagnostic methods to avoid errors. The combination of traditional and molecular methods can improve diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: metagenomic next-generation sequencing, Prototheca wickerhamii, Mycobacterium haemophilum, co-infection