已发表论文

死亡凸显下的时间视角与亲社会行为:来自中国大学生的证据

 

Authors Chang SH , Wu P, Li HZ, Jin XY, Zhong BL 

Received 10 April 2025

Accepted for publication 6 September 2025

Published 9 September 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1943—1953

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S533218

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Zhenhao Shi

She-Hui Chang,1,2,* Peng Wu,1,* Hui-Zhi Li,2 Xing-Yue Jin,2 Bao-Liang Zhong2,3 

1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China; 2Research Center for Psychological and Health Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Psychiatry, Wuhan Mental Health Center, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Bao-Liang Zhong, Department of Psychiatry, Wuhan Mental Health Center, Wuhan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China, Email haizhilan@gmail.com

Purpose: Existing research on mortality salience (MS) and prosocial behavior demonstrates inconsistent findings, suggesting potential moderation by psychological variables. One such potential moderator is temporal perspective, which fundamentally shapes individuals’ understanding of life course. This study examines how temporal perspective moderates the effect of MS on prosocial behavior.
Patients and Methods: A 3 (blank control vs linear temporal perspective vs cyclical temporal perspective) × 2 (MS vs dental pain) between-subjects design was implemented. Participants (N=212) were randomly assigned to different groups. Prosocial behavior was measured through self-reported helping intentions. Participants’ prosocial behavior was compared across six experimental conditions defined by the combination of temporal perspective and MS manipulations.
Results: MS significantly increased prosocial behavior relative to control. Temporal perspective moderated this effect: Linear priming amplified MS-induced prosociality, whereas cyclical priming attenuated the effect to non-significance. Control group showed moderate MS effects. Critically, a significant interaction emerged between temporal perspective and MS in predicting prosocial behavior.
Conclusion: The findings reconcile previous inconsistencies by demonstrating temporal perspective’s critical moderating role. Linear temporal perspective strengthens MS effects through enhanced existential threat awareness, while cyclical temporal perspective helps individuals avoid the awareness of mortality’s inevitability via natural cycle conceptualizations. This suggests temporal cognition interventions could modulate prosocial outcomes in death-related contexts, with implications for terror management applications in social behavior modification.

Keywords: terror management theory, mortality salience, prosocial behavior, temporal perspective, linear temporal perspective, cyclical temporal perspective