108985
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.4 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.2 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.7 Clin Interv Aging
- 5.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 3.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.6 Int J Women's Health
- 2.9 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.8 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.2 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 3.0 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 3.2 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.0 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.1 J Inflamm Res
- 2.0 Int J Gen Med
- 3.4 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.0 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.2 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.4 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
谷歌搜索与 ChatGPT 对 PICC 置管护理中患者理解及潜在依从性的影响：一项比较分析
Authors Yang F, Ma J, Liu M, Du Z
Received 4 July 2025
Accepted for publication 3 October 2025
Published 22 October 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 3275—3284
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S551679
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Fang Yang,1 Jun Ma,1 Manman Liu,1 Zhuang Du2
1Department of Hematology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of the First Operating Room, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Fang Yang, Department of Hematology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 6, Fucheng Road, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +861066958322, Email yangfangxgg@163.com Zhuang Du, Department of the First Operating Room, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, No. 826, Xinan Road, Dalian, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +8641184412001, Email duzhuangvip@163.com
Objective: To compare the quality and comprehensiveness of information on peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provided by Google and the artificial intelligence (AI) tool ChatGPT, and to identify the implications for patient understanding, informed decision-making, and potential adherence in oncology care.
Methods: In a simulated study, the top 20 PICC-related frequently asked questions (FAQs) were identified via a standardized Google search. These questions were posed to both platforms, and the responses were systematically analyzed and compared for source, type, and content.
Results: Google’s answers were fragmented and sourced mainly from government websites (45%). In contrast, ChatGPT provided comprehensive, synthesized responses, primarily from academic sources (70%), as inferred from the content, given its lack of explicit source attribution. Critically, significant discrepancies in key clinical information were found. For instance, Google’s top answer for PICC longevity was “two to six weeks”, while ChatGPT suggested “up to six months or more”, creating a high potential for patient confusion and undermining trust in prescribed care plans.
Conclusion: ChatGPT has the potential to offer more integrated health information than traditional search engines, thereby influencing how patients access knowledge. However, the presence of conflicting and decontextualized information introduces significant risks, such as patient confusion and anxiety, which can negatively impact trust, shared decision-making, and adherence to medical advice.
Keywords: peripherally inserted central catheter, ChatGPT, google, patient preference, adherence, shared decision-making
1Department of Hematology, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of the First Operating Room, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Fang Yang, Department of Hematology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 6, Fucheng Road, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +861066958322, Email yangfangxgg@163.com Zhuang Du, Department of the First Operating Room, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, No. 826, Xinan Road, Dalian, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +8641184412001, Email duzhuangvip@163.com
Objective: To compare the quality and comprehensiveness of information on peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provided by Google and the artificial intelligence (AI) tool ChatGPT, and to identify the implications for patient understanding, informed decision-making, and potential adherence in oncology care.
Methods: In a simulated study, the top 20 PICC-related frequently asked questions (FAQs) were identified via a standardized Google search. These questions were posed to both platforms, and the responses were systematically analyzed and compared for source, type, and content.
Results: Google’s answers were fragmented and sourced mainly from government websites (45%). In contrast, ChatGPT provided comprehensive, synthesized responses, primarily from academic sources (70%), as inferred from the content, given its lack of explicit source attribution. Critically, significant discrepancies in key clinical information were found. For instance, Google’s top answer for PICC longevity was “two to six weeks”, while ChatGPT suggested “up to six months or more”, creating a high potential for patient confusion and undermining trust in prescribed care plans.
Conclusion: ChatGPT has the potential to offer more integrated health information than traditional search engines, thereby influencing how patients access knowledge. However, the presence of conflicting and decontextualized information introduces significant risks, such as patient confusion and anxiety, which can negatively impact trust, shared decision-making, and adherence to medical advice.
Keywords: peripherally inserted central catheter, ChatGPT, google, patient preference, adherence, shared decision-making