已发表论文

泛免疫炎症值可预测不稳定型心绞痛患者发生心肌梗死的风险及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结局

 

Authors Chen C, Zhao B, Fan Y, Peng J

Received 14 August 2025

Accepted for publication 4 November 2025

Published 10 December 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 7433—7445

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S560646

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Redoy Ranjan

Ce Chen, Bo Zhao, Yongyan Fan, Jianjun Peng

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Jianjun Peng, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13911028133, Email pengjianjunmedical@163.com

Objective: This study investigates the potential of the pan-immune-inflammatory value (PIV) as a predictive indicator for myocardial infarction (MI) risk in unstable angina pectoris (UAP) patients and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: UAP patients diagnosed with MI underwent PCI and were monitored for MACE, including mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, cerebrovascular accidents, and heart failure admissions. Clinical profiles and PIV levels were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to identify variables associated with MI and MACE risk.
Results: MI patients had higher PIV (409.07 ± 127.63 vs 284.44 ± 126.96 × 1018/L2, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (2.91 ± 1.04 vs 2.31 ± 1.06 mmol/L, P < 0.001) levels. Both PIV (OR = 1.008, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (OR = 1.694, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of MI. ROC analysis showed that PIV had stronger discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.755) than LDL-C (AUC = 0.661), with their combined model improving predictive performance (AUC = 0.787). In PCI-treated MI patients, those developing MACE had higher PIV (452.66 ± 105.24 vs 378.45 ± 133.53 × 1018/L2, P = 0.001) and TC levels (4.84 ± 0.39 vs 4.66 ± 0.42 mmol/L, P = 0.010). Both TC (OR = 3.337, P = 0.007) and PIV (OR = 1.005, P = 0.001) were independently associated with MACE. The combined model (AUC = 0.721) outperformed individual markers.
Conclusion: PIV is independently associated with MI risk in UAP patients and MACE following PCI. Combining PIV with lipid markers may enhance clinical risk assessment and inform management strategies.

Keywords: pan-immune-inflammatory value, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, major adverse cardiovascular events, predictive value