已发表论文

2005 至 2024 年健康职业教育教学模式研究趋势:基于 CiteSpace 的文献计量分析

 

Authors Jin Y, Song Y, Li X, Wu H, Zhang Q

Received 6 June 2025

Accepted for publication 17 November 2025

Published 12 December 2025 Volume 2025:16 Pages 2307—2325

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S545118

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder

Yanpeng Jin,1,2 Yan Song,1 Xiuyuan Li,1 Haijiang Wu,1 Qin Zhang1,3 

1Medical-Education Coordination and Medical Education Research Center, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China; 2Basical Medical College, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, People’s Republic of China; 3Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Haijiang Wu, Email haijianglaoqi@hebmu.edu.cn Qin Zhang, Email zhangqin@pumc.edu.cn

Objective: This study seeks to offer medical educators, researchers, and clinical practitioners a novel, comprehensive, and visually engaging perspective on the field. It accomplishes this by analyzing the research trends, frontier topics, and pressing issues related to Health Professions Education Model (HPEM) over the past two decades from 2005 to 2024.
Methods: This study employed CiteSpace 6.4.R1 and R-tool (version 4.5.1) software to conduct an analysis of articles pertaining to the Health Professions Education Model within the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. The analysis encompassed various aspects, including keywords, disciplines, countries, institutions, authors, and references.
Results: A total of 2,953 articles were incorporated into this study. The predominant research topics within this domain encompassed “interprofessional education (IPE)”, “competency-based continuing professional development (CPD)”, and “student-led professional experiences (SLEs).” The five countries with the highest number of publications related to Health Professions Education Model (HPEM) were the United States, Australia, Canada, England, and China. Notable authors in this field included Olle ten Cate, Frank Jason R. Eric S. Holmboe, and Carol Carraccio. Additionally, the journals that emerged as the leading publications in this discipline were Academic Medicine, Medical Education, and Medical Teacher.
Conclusion: This study emphasizes the critical importance of international cooperation and exchange, particularly highlighting the necessity to strengthen collaboration among relevant institutions and prominent scholars in Europe, the United States of America, and China. Furthermore, it underscores current trends in the development of HPEM, specifically interprofessional education and competency-based continuing professional development. The research offers valuable insights for medical educators, scholars, and clinicians, enhancing their understanding of prevailing research trends and future directions within Health Professions Education Model.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis, citespace, health professions education, model