已发表论文

FLT3-ITD  和 NPM1  双突变的急性髓细胞白血病患者应接受 CR1 的异基因造血干细胞移植,以获得更好的预后

 

Authors Huang Y, Hu J, Lu T, Luo Y, Shi J, Wu W, Han X, Zheng W, He J, Cai Z, Wei G, Huang H, Sun J

Received 25 November 2018

Accepted for publication 22 March 2019

Published 8 May 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 4129—4142

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S194523

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Cristina Weinberg

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Dr Beicheng Sun

Background: According to the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, the risk level in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with FLT3-ITD  and NPM1  double mutation (AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+ ) depends on the allelic ratio of FLT3-ITD . But despite a low or high allelic ratio of FLT3-ITD , AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients belong to the favorable or intermediate risk, for whom allogeneic stem cell transplantation is not obligated. However, some latest studies pointing out that NPM1  and FLT3-ITD  double mutation patients showed an inferior prognosis, which have raised concern about the risk categorization and more effective treatment of AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients.
Methods: A total of 76 patients were selected for coexisting FLT3  and NPM1  mutations with normal cytogenetics. The prognostic risk factors were analyzed, and treatment strategies including allogeneic stem cell transplantati1on and chemotherapy were compared.
Results: In 76 AML
FLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients, 36.8% of patients had hyperleukocytosis (HL) and DNMT3A R882  mutation was the most common concomitant gene (23.7%). For 53 patients in the complete remission (CR), 22 had received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on first complete remission (CR1). Patients in transplantation group had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than chemotherapy only (=0.002 and 0.001, respectively). In multivariable Cox model analyses, HL and DNMT3A R882  mutation were independent adverse prognostic factors (all <0.05) for AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients. Nevertheless, allo-HSCT was an independent good factor of OS and DFS (=0.001 and 0.000; HR =0.173 and 0.138; 95% CI were 0.062–0.483 and 0.049–0.389). And allo-HSCT could moderately improve the poor prognosis of AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+/DNMT3A R882+ .
Conclusion: Although, AML
FLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients are categorized as favorable or intermediate risk levels according to recent NCCN and ELN guidelines, these patients should receive allo-HSCT in CR1 for a longer survival. AMLFLT3-ITD+/NPM1+  patients with DNMT3A R882  mutation had a very poor prognosis, and allo-HSCT could moderately improve their survival.
Keywords: FLT3-ITD NPM1 DNMT3A R882 , allo-HSCT




Figure 2 Comparison of chemotherapy and allo-HSCT in patients received CR1...