论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Li J, Li W, Dai X, Zhong D, Ding Y, Chen X
Received 7 January 2019
Accepted for publication 23 March 2019
Published 20 May 2019 Volume 2019:13 Pages 1739—1749
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S200679
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Cristiana Tanase
Background and objective: Paclitaxel
protein-bound particles for injectable suspension (nab-paclitaxel) showed many
advantages in safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Different from
conventional formulations, the bioequivalence evaluation of nab-paclitaxel
formulations requires to determine the total amount of paclitaxel in plasma and
the unbound paclitaxel to reflect their in vivo disposition. This study aimed
to develop an analytical method to quantify the total and unbound paclitaxel in
plasma and evaluate the bioequivalence of two formulations of nab-paclitaxel in
patients with breast cancer.
Materials and methods: An
open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study was completed among 24
Chinese patients with breast cancer. The patients were randomized to receive
either the test formulation on cycle 1 day 1 and after 21 days in cycle 2
day 1 by the reference formulation (Abraxane®), or vice versa. Rapid
equilibrium dialysis was adopted to separate the unbound paclitaxel in human
plasma. Total and unbound paclitaxel concentrations were measured by the
validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods over the range
of 5.00–15,000 and 0.200–200 ng/mL, respectively. The bioequivalence of
the test formulation to the reference formulation was assessed using the Food
and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.
Results: All the
90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios fell within the
predetermined acceptance range. The 90% CIs for the area under the
concentration–time curve (AUC) from 0 h to 72 h (AUC0–t), AUC from
time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞), and peak
plasma concentrations (Cmax) for total
paclitaxel were 92.03%–98.05%, 91.98%–99.37%, and 91.37%–99.36%, respectively.
The 90% CIs of AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax for
unbound paclitaxel were 86.77%–97.88%, 86.81%–97.88%, and 87.70%–98.86%, respectively.
Conclusion: Bioequivalence
between the two nab-paclitaxel formulations was confirmed for total and unbound
paclitaxel at the studied dose regimen.
Keywords: nab-paclitaxel,
bioequivalence, rapid equilibrium dialysis, unbound fraction, pharmacokinetics
