已发表论文

恶性肿瘤髓内脊髓转移:体系分析和回顾

 

Authors Lv J, Liu B, Quan X, Li C, Dong L, Liu M

Received 2 November 2018

Accepted for publication 14 March 2019

Published 21 June 2019 Volume 2019:12 Pages 4741—4753

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S193235

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Federico Perche

Background: Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) in malignancies is a devastating issue with limited research. This study aims to identify the clinical features, management, prognostic factors, and outcomes of this special entity.
Methods: A retrospective review of 61 patients of ISCM diagnosed and treated in our institute from June 2010 to March 2018 was conducted (lost to follow-up: 3). Data were retrieved according to the items including age, gender, primary tumor, interval to the ISCM occurrence, ISCM segments, and other synchronous metastases. The interventions, response, prognostic factors, and outcomes of ISCM were systematically analyzed.
Results: Lung cancer (67.21%) was the commonest ISCM source, followed by breast cancer (14.75%). In total, 9.84% of patients presented with ISCM initially. The mean span from the primaries to ISCM was 18.77 months (range=0–10 years). The thoracic segment was most commonly involved (77.05%), followed by cervical (39.34%), lumbar level (34.43%), and conus medullaris (6.56%). The management of ISCM was challenging, since 55.74% of individuals had a poor physical condition (PS=3–4) and 72.41% had widespread dissemination synchronously (≥2 organs). Radiotherapy (RT) attained an objective response rate (ORR) of 61.90% or 62.50% and a local control rate (LCR) of 90.48% or 87.50% for symptoms used alone or with other strategies, respectively. ISCM bears a dismal prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Patients with only one segment involved had an apparently better prognosis than those with 2–4 involved segments (median OS=7.0 vs 3.0 months) (<0.01). The OS of patients treated was remarkably superior to those without any intervention (median OS=5.0 vs 2.0 months) (<0.01).
Conclusion: ISCM is a distinct entity needing more attention for high cancer incidence, prolonged survival, and lack of research. RT is the mainstay with satisfactory effect. Multiple spinal cord segments involvement and no treatment are poor prognostic factors of OS.
Keywords: intramedullary spinal cord metastasis, radiotherapy, combined treatment




Figure 1 Histologic types of primary cancer in the development of ISCM (n=61).